A Summary On Psychological Testing Child Custody

By Patrick Foster

Children should be sheltered from careless and un-protective parents. If a divorcee feels that their kids are not safe with a mentally unstable partner, then one can request for psychological testing child custody. To prove a case, judges require both prosecutors and prosecuted undergo a series of mental tests to ascertain the credibility of allegations. Intuitively, cognitively unstable parents may have cases of previously injuring a kid, dependability on certain drugs as well as un-called off parenting behaviors. However, this approach is limited by various reasons such as a number of tests worth carrying out to prove mental stability, inconsistent psychologists, bias including others. Below is a detailed discussion of such limitations.

The identification of which parent to take charge of kids involves various activities. First is the assessment of mental health through a series of interviews. Here, specialists ask individuals a number of questions. However, procedures, questions as well as the design of the interview are not scientifically universal. Therefore, each specialist has their own set of queries and guidelines covering an interview session.

Quality of each session performed by different interviewers cannot be verified. Since there are no uniform guidelines on interview procedures, judges cannot tell a skilled specialist from an unskilled one. Likewise, since each specialist has the freedom to ask any set of questions, they may be biased. For this reason, decisions made using this information could grant care to a wrong party.

Interviewing is followed by medical examination. Some conditions are known to largely influence how brains work hence are valuable in cognitive assessment. Such include Rorschach inkblot plus others. While there are many tests, scientists do not give universal guidelines on what every specialist should evaluate. Likewise, no uniform tools are expected to be used across mental health institutions.

For instance, one psychologist can decide to carry out a different procedure while another may adopt a different technique. While there are few tests considered a must in various countries, erroneous information gathered by specialists may promote unsound judgment.

Observations are written down at the end of interviews and screening. It is important to note that individual behaviors are inconsistent. Particular events may trigger persons to act in a certain manner during assessment. Making judgments using that information is therefore unfair. Likewise, interview techniques, screened conditions, as well as check-up machines, vary from one specialist to another. Consequently, the ruling should not entirely depend on facts given by such professionals.

Another process involves the evaluation of check-up outcomes. This may be done by non-specialists representing a certain individual. For this reason, translation is done leaning on one side. Similarly, bias starts from information gathering where assessors gather facts of interest only. It is possible to collaborate with specialists to give false information favoring a client.

The court ruling is expected to be as fair as possible. However, due to biases illustrated in the above points, this is usually not possible.

About the Author:

No comments:

Post a Comment

©2012-2014 All Rights Reserved Bestfit34.